FirePro M5950 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 542% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2232 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 5% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |