FirePro M6000 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M6000 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M6000 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6000 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 423% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 176 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 1368 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6000 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Heathrow | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-B | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |