FirePro M7740 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between FirePro M7740 and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M7740 and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 275% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M7740 is 76 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro M7740 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2132 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi |
| Code name | RV740 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |