FirePro S9000 vs Tesla M2070 Q

When comparing FirePro S9000 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S9000

Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro S9000 has 55% more power consumption, than Tesla M2070 Q.
FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9000 and Tesla M2070 Q have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro S9000 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 2368 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	3−4
ultra / 1080p	21−24	1−2
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	14−16
medium / 1080p	40−45	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	55−60	8−9
ultra / 1080p	45−50	6−7
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	21−24
medium / 1080p	60−65	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	250−260	120−130
medium / 768p	220−230	100−110
ultra / 1080p	180−190	50−55
QHD / 1440p	110−120	24−27
4K / 2160p	70−75	−
high / 768p	210−220	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
medium / 1080p	55−60	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	120−130	75−80
medium / 768p	110−120	55−60
ultra / 1080p	100−110	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	45−50	4−5
ultra / 1080p	40−45	4−5
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	1−2
low / 720p	80−85	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	12−14
ultra / 1080p	45−50	7−8
QHD / 1440p	27−30	4−5
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	60−65
medium / 1080p	110−120	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	8−9
ultra / 1080p	45−50	7−8
QHD / 1440p	30−35	0−1
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	21−24
medium / 1080p	65−70	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	140−150	50−55
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	10−11
ultra / 1080p	30−35	4−5
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	9−10
medium / 1080p	30−35	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	130−140	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	8−9
medium / 1080p	35−40	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	130−140	20−22
medium / 768p	85−90	12−14
high / 1080p	45−50	7−8
ultra / 1080p	24−27	5−6
4K / 2160p	16−18	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	90−95	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	50−55	18−20
high / 768p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Tahiti	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1792	448
Core clock speed	900 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro S9000 vs Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares