FirePro S9050 vs Tesla M2070 Q

When comparing FirePro S9050 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9050 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 6 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro S9050 is 6 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 2368 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	1−2
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	24−27	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	27−30	6−7
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	230−240	120−130
medium / 768p	200−210	100−110
ultra / 1080p	110−120	50−55
QHD / 1440p	85−90	24−27
4K / 2160p	45−50	−
high / 768p	160−170	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	55−60	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	120−130	75−80
medium / 768p	100−110	55−60
ultra / 1080p	80−85	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	27−30	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
QHD / 1440p	14−16	4−5
low / 720p	120−130	60−65
medium / 1080p	70−75	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	100−110	50−55
medium / 768p	90−95	−
high / 1080p	40−45	10−11
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	9−10
medium / 1080p	16−18	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	8−9
medium / 1080p	20−22	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	70−75	20−22
medium / 768p	45−50	12−14
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	90−95	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Tahiti	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1792	448
Core clock speed	900 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Length	254 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares