FirePro V7900 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing FirePro V7900 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V7900 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Tesla M2070 Q has 49% more power consumption, than FirePro V7900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
FirePro V7900 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 31 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
3−4
ultra / 1080p
6−7
1−2
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
20−22
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V7900 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
120−130
medium / 768p
150−160
100−110
ultra / 1080p
75−80
50−55
QHD / 1440p
45−50
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
110−120
75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
FirePro V7900 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
80−85
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
1−2
low / 720p
30−33
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
20−22
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 56% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
70−75
50−55
medium / 768p
60−65
−
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
7−8
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
9−10
medium / 1080p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
−
70−75
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
100−105
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
40−45
20−22
medium / 768p
24−27
12−14
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 111% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
40−45
ultra / 1080p
27−30
18−20
high / 768p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Code name
Cayman
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1280
448
Core clock speed
725 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
1,027.7 gflops
Length
279 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
