FirePro W5100 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W5100 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W5100 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W5100
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W5100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 356 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla M2070 Q is 77 mm longer, than FirePro W5100.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5100 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 188% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Bonaire | GF100 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |