FirePro W7170M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing FirePro W7170M and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Tonga | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |