FirePro W8100 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2% more power consumption, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 250 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro W8100 is 31 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 527% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Hawaii | GF100 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |