GeForce 920MX vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce 920MX and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920MX and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1306% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 391 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce 920MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920MX and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 31% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Minecraft is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |