GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800M GTS SLI will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTS SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is manufactured by 55/65 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2332 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Minecraft is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | NB9E-GT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 July 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55/65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X