GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 425 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 3868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Fortnite is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | N17P-G0 Max-Q | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 999 - 1189 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1139 - 1328 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 53.12 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 660
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 880M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 660
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X