GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 mobile will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 821 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 4868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 314% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Tesla M2070 Q vs FirePro W8100
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X