GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 461 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 6868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 314% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X