GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 24 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2182 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 21% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Code name | NB9E-GTX | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 224 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |