GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 285M SLI stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285M SLI is 2 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2112 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Code name | N10E-GTX | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |