GeForce GTX 460M vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1530 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 776 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1882 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |