GeForce GTX 560M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1530 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 201 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1882 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Minecraft is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |