GeForce GTX 660M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 660M and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 660M and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 261 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1132 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Fortnite is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GE | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |