GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 332 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 327% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 124% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Fortnite is 185% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 283% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 172% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Metro Exodus is 440% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 322% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GR | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1920 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 5080 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |