GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 11150% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 675M SLI is 46 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 132 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 245% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Fortnite is 138% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 255% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 675M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N12E-GTX2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |