GeForce GTX 680M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- GeForce GTX 680M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- GeForce GTX 680M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 680M is 146 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Fortnite is 119% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GTX | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 4 June 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X