GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M SLI will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 245% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Fortnite is 138% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 255% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x 2540 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X