GeForce GTX 860M vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 223 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 860M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 119% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | N15P-GX | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |