GeForce GTX 880M vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 880M and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 880M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 84% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 380 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |