GeForce GTX 960M vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 960M and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 960M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 960M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 960M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 522 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 632 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Fortnite is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Forza Horizon 4 is 208% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 960M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N16P-GX | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 47.04 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |