GeForce MX150 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce MX150 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX150 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX150 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce MX150 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX150 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 894 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce MX150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 2876 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce MX150 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
GeForce MX150 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 64% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 108% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX150 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | N17S-G1 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 May 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1468 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Iris Graphics 540
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X