GeForce MX330 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce MX330 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX330 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX330 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- GeForce MX330 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX330.
- GeForce MX330 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX330 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 957 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce MX330 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 3868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX330 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 141% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX330 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |