GeForce MX350 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX350 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX350 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1025% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 780 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 3868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX350 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 188% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX350 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 20 February 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |