GRID K220Q vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
GRID K220Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 71% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
GRID K220Q and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 53% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K220Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 July 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |