GRID K260Q vs Tesla M2070 Q

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	21−24	6−7
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	100−110
ultra / 1080p	95−100	50−55
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	95−100	60−65
medium / 1080p	50−55	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	7−8
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	85−90	50−55
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	9−10
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	55−60	20−22
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 177% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1536	448
Core clock speed	745 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s

GRID K260Q vs Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares