GRID M6 8Q vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M6 8Q stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M6 8Q
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 148 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM204 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |