Iris Graphics 5100 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 5100 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 650% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 374 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |