Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 July 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X