Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |