Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 141% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 64 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R7 360
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X