Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 122 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 374 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT3e | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon RX 550X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X