Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Mobility Radeon HD 4850 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4850 here:
Main Specs
| Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 74 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2282 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 10% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi |
| Code name | M98 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 January 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 850 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Iris Graphics 5100
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce 930M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Iris Graphics 5100
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce 930M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X