NVS 810 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between NVS 810 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 810 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
NVS 810
Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Tesla M2070 Q has 230% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 328 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla M2070 Q is 50 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
21−24
24−27
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
high / 768p
65−70
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
NVS 810 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
10−12
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 31% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
9−10
medium / 1080p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
70−75
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
85−90
−
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
8−9
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
20−22
medium / 768p
8−9
12−14
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Code name
GM107
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
4 November 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
512
448
Core clock speed
902 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
32.14
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
1,027.7 gflops
Length
198 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
5.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
