Quadro FX 3800 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla M2070 Q is 50 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1532 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 73% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GT200B | GF100 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |