Quadro K1000M vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K1000M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
- Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 50% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K1000M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N14P-Q1 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |