Quadro K2200M vs Tesla M2070 Q

In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2200M

Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Tesla M2070 Q has 246% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 93 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	1−2
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	24−27	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	27−30	6−7
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	230−240	120−130
medium / 768p	200−210	100−110
ultra / 1080p	110−120	50−55
QHD / 1440p	85−90	24−27
4K / 2160p	45−50	−
high / 768p	160−170	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	55−60	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	120−130	75−80
medium / 768p	100−110	55−60
ultra / 1080p	75−80	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	24−27	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
QHD / 1440p	14−16	4−5
low / 720p	120−130	60−65
medium / 1080p	70−75	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	100−110	50−55
medium / 768p	90−95	−
high / 1080p	40−45	10−11
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	9−10
medium / 1080p	16−18	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	8−9
medium / 1080p	20−22	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	70−75	20−22
medium / 768p	45−50	12−14
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	90−95	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	19 July 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	640	448
Core clock speed	667 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	32.14
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+

Quadro K2200M vs Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares