Quadro M1000M vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M1000M and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M1000M stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 419 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro M1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M1000M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 188% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |