Quadro M2200 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Quadro M2200 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2200 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 120 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro M2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 2376 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 327% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 185% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 291% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 172% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 460% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 242% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N17P-Q3 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 694 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5508 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |