Quadro P3200 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro P3200 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro P3200 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P3200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6078 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 134 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 3876 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 590% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 80−85 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 163% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 750% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 347% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 533% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 290% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 840% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 485% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 666% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Quadro P3200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | N18E-Q1 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 February 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |