Radeon 520 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon 520 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon 520 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon 520 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- Radeon 520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- Radeon 520 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon 520 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 456 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon 520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 882 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 50% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon 520 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Oland | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 March 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |