Radeon HD 7970M vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon HD 7970M and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 7970M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon HD 7970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7970M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7970M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7970M.
- Radeon HD 7970M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7970M.
- Radeon HD 7970M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 7970M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon HD 7970M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M is 1668 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Fortnite is 138% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7970M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Wimbledon XT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 May 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 68.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 254 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |