Radeon Pro 450 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 450 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 1948 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 October 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |