Radeon Pro 455 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 455 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 455 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 455.
- Radeon Pro 455 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 455 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 281 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro 455 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 455 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 11 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 October 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.04 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |