Radeon R7 Carrizo vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Radeon R7 Carrizo and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 Carrizo and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 Carrizo | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1775% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo is build with GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Radeon R7 Carrizo is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R7 Carrizo and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 16% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 Carrizo | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Carrizo | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2410 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |